A manifestação mediúnica como meio de prova no processo judicial.

Abstract

This work of major conclusion documents the study about the theme: The psychic manifestations in evidence at the judicial process" focusing the concepts of process and procedure, proof and mediumship, also the investigation about the possibility of using other forms of psychic manifestation as judicial evidence. The subject was directed to the field of criminal, civil and labor procedures, and the used methodology of research was the dialectic, bypassing the use of exegetic-juridical, historic- evolutional methods, comparative and inductive studies. The scientific study is structured into three chapters: the first chapter brings out the approach in the judicial process, showing the fundamental role and presence of the State-judge as a mediator of the conflicts and responsible for the public order; the second chapter deals with the issues of proof, viewing the points when the judge faces the consideration of these, the systems of evaluation, the means, types proof and freedom of evidence; at last, in the third chapter are presented, above psychographics writing, other forms of psychic manifestation, capable of being used as evidence in judicial procedure, for example, the psicofonic, psychometric, clairvoyance, etc. Thus, it appears that there is no question about the acceptance of psychographic letters, which have proven technical- scientific grounds, for the current opinion regarding the use of other forms of psychic manifestations, regardless of religious beliefs of the judge, and refuted the possibility of considering it illegal evidence. Also, was demonstrated the great contribution of the used scientific methods in establishing the veracity of the evidence in matter, for example, the grafoscopic expertise and verification test of the speaker's voice. Therefore, recognized the incidence of numerous practical cases, where psychographic documents have been accepted by judges, especially in the Courtroom, serving as a basis for the discharge of the respondent, it's attested the viability of using psicofonic, clairvoyant, clairvoyance and recording of voices, among others, as way of proof, since they also appears in the legal scenario, not admitting that the law professionals continue to pretend that this latent reality does not exist..